Friday, June 25, 2010

The end of The Descent & The Descent 2

First off, a big thank you to Caitlin of 1416andcounting.com for the great review of The Descent 2 yesterday. I like to think she had fun writing that review, and I know that I had a blast writing my review for her site. So, again, thank you (let's do this again!).

One of the things that I really shied away from in discussing The Descent 2 was it's ending. And today, that's what I want to talk about.

So, you know, you've been warned.

As you may recall, at the end of The Descent, Sarah sacrifices Juno to escape the cave monsters. Now, of course, by this point she's seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate... No. That was someone else. Sarah has seen her friends die in the caves She's seen a terrible side of her friend Juno; she learned that her husband had cheated on her with Juno and watched Juno kill one of the group. In order to survive, Sarah went through one hell of a traumatic experience, culminating in turning on Juno and leaving her to be devoured by the cave monsters.

And then, a mere day or two later in movie time, after her amazing escape with her life, if not her sanity, she's tossed right back into the caves. She's already scarred, but Deputy Rios isn't. Rios' journey is very similar to Sarah's from the first movie. It's Rios who has to sacrifice her colleague to save Sarah. It's Rios who has the child she may lose as a result of this ordeal. And there are times where it's easy to think that Sarah realizes all of this, too. And I think that Sarah realizes that she lost a big part of herself in the caves, and doesn't want that to happen to Rios. So, while Rios had to do some awful things, like hack someone's arm off with a pick ax, you get the feeling that her humanity was intact. Rios' first instinct may have been to leave Juno to die, but it wasn't out of selfishness, it was just pragmatic. By that point, she was willing to make the same decisions to escape, but for much more rational reasons. This mirroring is evident even in the clothes that they wear. Rios' outfit is nearly identical to what Sarah was wearing when she escaped.

Watching the movie, you can't help but feel good when Rios escapes the cave. When Sarah escaped in the first movie, you just had this feeling that she'd never be  the same, that the trauma had just gotten to her, not so for Rios. When Rios runs out of the cave, there's a sense that everything is going to be fine. She'll go back to her kid and everything will work out ok for her, which is why the sudden blow to the head with a shovel is such a WTF moment.

It's not the only reason though. There is a complete lack of foreshadowing. The old man that hits Rios is the same guy who Sarah found on the road at the beginning and brought her to a hospital. Why didn't he feed Sarah to them? How on Earth is he just WAITING for someone to escape the cave, and also just happens to have a handy shovel with him? It's ridiculous and poorly executed. I understand that they're trying to use it to launch into a third movie, and that's fine, but the whole thing has no context and just makes you with that the movie had ended about 120 seconds sooner.

When the movie ended, all I could think was 'What the fuck??? I need to talk to someone about this!'. It's just that kind of a thing. I mean, here I am, days later, still trying to figure it out. I'm still trying to make sense of the whole thing.

If you've seen The Descent 2 as well, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the ending, or in general, in the comments.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Well, I haven't yet posted my full review of D2, but I can say that the ending sent flaming rage up my cheeks. What bullshit. I mean, in general, this is a film that's just . . . not necessary (nor was it desired by me), but I saw it because I have that horrible compulsion to see movies that are even vaguely interesting. And there I sat (having locked myself out of my apartment and employed a stranger to break back in--so maybe not the best mindset to begin the film) watching it with such great hope. And it . . . was not too good. Really, the problem with the second one is that it was completely unbelievable. I'm reading a lot of horror bloggers who are giving it positive reviews, and I have a feeling this is stained with the love of the earlier film because really, this one just doesn't work.

Having said that, if it were a stand alone film, I think I would like it. It's that they sandwich it in with the original that pisses me off. Get rid of the original cavers, and just have a crew looking in the caves for some other party, you dig?

Oh, yeah, and the ending is ludicrous.
3 replies · active 768 weeks ago
I don't think my personal enjoyment of D2 was because of my fond memories of the first. I remember watching and enjoying the first, but it's been years since I watched it and had to actually pop it in to remember how it ended. I honestly enjoyed this movie on it's own merits (minus the last 2 minutes). A movie sequel is generally going to be what you enjoyed about the original, but upping the ante. This did that. Maybe too well. It WAS very much like the first. I, apparently, didn't mind that as much as you.
I didn't mean to suggest that everyone who liked it liked it because of the original. The trouble is, I don't think it has "its own merits." Everything good about it was something pulled from the original film. And that, to me, is what makes it unnecessary. If you aren't going to do something new, what is the point? I guess, also, this is all colored by the fact that I generally don't like sequels. I still see them, which is a stupid choice on my part, but I usually think we should leave well enough alone. Dig?
I think it does have it's own merits. Obviously it lifts a lot from the original by design. It sets up a much larger cave system, and it establishes that others know about the caves and what's inside. Could it stand alone? No. Not a chance, but it's not designed to. It's built to continue from the first and bridge into the upcoming third. I think it's hard to judge this one until the third one is completed.

Post a new comment

Comments by